The Positive Effect of Capital Punishment in Modern America

Ronnie Kuester Dr. Borgmeyer Eng. Comp. II 30 Sept. 2010 The Positive Effect of Capital punishment in Modern America I dont think you should domiciliate the decease penalisation to seek revenge. I dont think thats right. I think the reason to support the wipeout penalty is beca give it saves other peoples lives (Bush). Capital punishment is one of the most polemical topics in the American society and is also one of the topics most people feel very horny roughly. Everyone feels that their views be correct because there argon bity pros and cons to either side.Although some people believe the encounter of executing the innocent is too great, the use of keen punishment has greatly impacted our society in a positive manner because of its deterring effect, sparing benefits, and the prevailing of justness. The deterrent effect is definitely one of the biggest benefits to having heavy(p) punishment. When people demand the knowledge that they could be go throughd for killing person else it often turns them away from inductting the murder. sixpence from Fort-Worth Star Telegram thinks that the deterrent effect has shown to prevent between three and eighteen murders(Wood 601).Most people in unexampled America have heard of the death penalty, yet they still commit the crimes that argon guilty by death. Since people know about it and still do it, they are basically accepting the sentence, unless they are mentally ill and in which cause do non repay sentenced to death. Naci Mocans study, from the University of Colorado, suggest that, statistical studies like his are among a dozen papers since 2001 that show capital punishment has deterrent effectuate(Wood 602). Abolitionists argue that the deterrent effect is only estimates and are not actually proven to deter murders.However, knowing, by means of and through many studies, that three to eighteen innocent people could be saved by executing for each one convicted killer greatly outweighs the benefits to letting the murderer off the hook. Although, the deterrent effect is the greatest benefit to having capital punishment, the economic problem is also very important. A suggested alternative to the death penalty is breeding in prison without parole. This upsets many of the taxpayers, as it should. An article in The Economist states, the idea of spending public cash to feed and clothe murderers for the rest of their lives seemed outrageous(Economist 605).Is there a difference to sentencing life in prison or executing someone? In the end they die a captive man. It is delaying the inevitable, only not many people see that. It is not very fair giving man his freedoms after he has proceedsn the lives of others. He himself has not respected the life and liberty that all people should have. Once you take away someones life yours should be taken in return. That is, only if it is murder in the first degree and the murder was committed intentionally. After be sentenced to life without parole their court dates are not done.Money keeps getting wasted in the courts after the sentencing. Most convicts are still trying to get a reduced sentence or get parole. Convicts going through trials for the death penalty and life in prison often have to wait a very long time, which in the cognitive process is spending a lot of the tax payers money. Either way, life in prison or the death penalty on average they wait a decade before a decision is make or the effect is carried out. Other than deterring crime and world economically beneficial, capital punishment also allows justness to prevail.Justice seems to always prevail, but in some instances, this is not the fortune. However, no innocent human has been executed through the use of DNA testing. Only the convicts who commit the worst, most heinous of crimes are even lay out on death row. Abolitionists see that the government is just killing someone. However, like the quote at the beginning, the government does not have the death penalty just to seek revenge. That is not what the death penalty is about. It is about justice being served and letting people know that murdering will not be acceptable.The government does not execute people to flaunt its power, Foucault agrees when he states, It is ugly to be punishable, there is no glory in gruelling(Foucault 10). It is because of this that America, along with many other nations, has done away with torturing as well. The government does respect points of the abolitionists precept it is not right torturing the convicts or causing extreme pain. They have changed their ways making the execution more humane. In our modern society we do not torture death row bunco games anymore.Foucault states that, right away we are rather inclined to ignore it perhaps, in its time, it gave rise to too much inflated empty words perhaps it has been attributed too readily and too emphatically to a process of humanization, thus dispensing with the read for further analysis(F oucault 7). It was thought that torture was a corrective procedure that if they were tortured they would not commit the crime again. However, it is viewed as inhumane to inflict pain on an individual to teach them discipline, especially if they are being put to death anyway. So now we use more humane ways to put people to death that involve little to no pain.Lethal injection is the most modern and safe way to put someone to death. It was first used in 1977 in Oklahoma but took five days before it was used on someone. All of the states except one that have the death penalty use lethal injection. The inmate being executed is bound down and has his heart being monitored. Then, they insert deuce needles into the veins injecting the inmate with Sodium Thiopental. This is an anesthetic which renders the inmate unconscious. Next flows pavulon or Pancuronium Bromide, which paralyzes the entire muscle system and halt the inmates preathing. Finally, the flow of potassium chloride stops the heart.Death results from anesthetic overdoes and respiratory and cardiac arrest go the condemned person is unconscious (Methods). This technique used does not hurt the inmate, which is one of the reasons abolitionists are upset about the death penalty. As for any other method, they get pretty painful and or messy. Death by electrocution, hanging, and gas chamber are all extremely painful and do not kill the inmate right away. Not only does justice prevail through the government when someone is executed but also people get a religious satisfaction. The book of account specifically states that the death penalty is alright. Whoso sheddeth mans blood, by man shall his blood be shed for in the image of theology made he man(Genesis 96). The reason why it is believed people should be executed for killing another human being is because we were made in Gods image and destroying or killing that is major offense to God. The Bible also informs its readers that none shall take ransom or money in exchange for the murderers life. This is where the justice comes into play. God does not want the government taking money in exchange for someones life. In modern day terms it would be equivalent to posting bail or just receiving a fine.That would be unrealistic to do in the case of a murderer being put to death. Abolitionists believe that we should not play God and only those who have not sinned be the ones to figure and cast the first stone so to speak. What most do not realize is that, according to the Bible, God thinks that these murderers should be killed. God is not going to just smite them down. Humans figured out and have interpreted the Bible and its meanings when saying these things about the death penalty. Most abolitionists greatest problem with the death penalty is executing the innocent. Executing the innocent is extremely rare.Hundreds of people have been released from death row collectable to DNA testing proving their innocence. This does not mean that they wer e executed. It is excellent that these people were not wrongly executed and it is because of modern technology that it can be appreciated. However, executing those who have been, without a doubt guilty of committing murder in the first degree should be executed. Throughout the use of DNA testing to possibly help the case of either side, there have been zero cases where and innocent human has been executed. Abolitionists keep seeing that the death penalty is still used despite the way they feel.So they begin to say things like, Killing a murderer does not bring his victim back to life. It achieves nothing but the death of still another person(Robinson). As stated at the beginning of this paper, by having the death penalty be legal it deters certain crime, has economic benefits, and it allows justice to be served. No matter what abolitionists are doing, most of their ideas keep getting shot down. in that location is a reason the majority has always sided with the death penalty, becau se it just helps out our modern American society.Works Cited Bush, George W. presidential Debate Washington University Athletic Complex. University of St. Louis. 17 Oct. 2000. Speech. Descriptions of Execution Methods. Deathpenaltyinfor. org. Death Penalty Information Center. Web. 22 Sept. 2010. . Foucault, Michel. Chapter 1. 1979. bailiwick and Punishment. Trans. Alan Sheridan. 3-18. Print. King James Version Bible. Genesis 96. 2004. Robinson, Bruce A. Capital Punishment the Death Penalty. ReligiousTolerance. org by the Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance. 04 Aug. 2007. Web. 22 Sept. 2010. . Wood, Nancy V. Perspectives on Argument. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009. Print. (601-613).