Tuesday, May 28, 2019
The Odyssey :: essays research papers fc
When one ponders the Greek mythology and literature, powerful images invariably come to mind. One relives the heroes struggles against innumerable odds, their battles against magical monsters, and the gods periodic intervention in mortal affairs. Yet, a common and often essential portion of a heroic epic is the heros consultation with an oracle or divinity. This prophecy is usually vituperative to the plot line, and also to the well being of the main characters. Could Priam have survived in the Achaean camp if not at the gods instruction (200-201)? Could the Argos have run the metal glove of the Prowling Rocks if not for the gods advice of using a sacrificial bird (349). Moreover, prophecy push aside be negative as well as positive. Achilles was prophesied to die gloriously in battle if he chose his lifes way as a warrior. Oedipus was exiled and condemned by his own words, after he slew his sire and wed his mother. This caseful of prophesy can blind even the gods themselves Chron os was fated to be defeated and his throne stolen by his son. Demeter loses Persephone periodically every year because her daughter ate the pits pomegranates. Prophecy plays an important role in the whole of Greek folklore. Something this ever-present bears further examination. In The Odyssey, prophecy in its myriad forms affects nearly every persuasion of the epic. Prophecies are seen in the forms of omens, signs, strict prediction of the future, divine condemnation, and divine instruction. Though conceptually these forms are hard to distinguish, they are clearly separate in the Odyssey. Moreover, prophecies can be interpreted not only on the "plot device" level, but also on the level of characterization. Whether a character accepts or denies the gods prophecies tells the indorser something about the character himself. Omens are brief prophecies intimately connected to the action at hand, which must be interpreted in terms of that action. Halitherses comments on the sho ot attack after Telemakhos condemns the suitors (463-464) he correctly interests it to mean that if the suitors keep feeding off Odysseuss possessions they will be destroyed. Yet the suitors ignore the omen, inviting their eventual destruction. This overbearing treatment of a divine omen is a justification for their deaths. When Penelope says if Odysseus had returned he would, with his son, surely slay the suitors, Telemakhos let loose a great act involuntarily (429). This omen reinforces the previous one, and simultaneously prepares the reader for the carnage to follow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment