Wednesday, January 30, 2019
Dangerous Dogs
Exercise A Dangerous dogs 1. Give an chalk out of the various views on self-destructive dogs presented in text 1, 2 and 3. there be different opinions in the three texts. In text 1, constabulary bask new law on killer dogs by Jamie Doward, the practice of law officer, Bernard Hogan-Howe has demanded a change to the law on weighty dogs so children are better protected and so the new rules will target the proprietors of self-destructive dogs, rather than the animals themselves. That happens after five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson was mauled by a pit bull and died.Four breeds were illegalize as followed by the 1991 Dangerous Dogs Act. That led to hundreds of people handing in their dogs to the constabulary in the Merseyside area, because they were afraid they might be prosecuted. Bernard Hogan-Howe says that there are straightaway 200 fewer illegal dogs in Merseyside. In text 2, cast aside owners of killer dogs by capital of Seychelles Stilwell has another view. She is against b reed-specific legislation. She means that you should face lock up if your dog kills someone, and it is time owners take responsibility when they mix kids and pets.The death of 13-month-old Archie-Lee Hirst mauled by his familys rottweiler has started a tighter control on dangerous dogs. But Victoria Stilwell says that people should not start thinking that exclusively rottweilers are killers, because they sure as shooting are not. Instead she recomwork forced people to consider which breed that take on into their home, and not to buy a dog on the net or from a backyard breeder. In text 3, If the dog is dangerous, the owner will be, overly by Simon Heffer, Simon Heffer himself means that the Dangerous Dogs Act is a pointless prepare of legislation, because many pit bulls are still to be found.He in any case writes that the owner of the dog, who killed five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson, Kiel Simpson was a drug dealer and was jailed for possessing 44Ib of cannabis. Simon Heffer thi nks that this underlines that if you meet a dangerous dog, a dangerous human is not far away. Both Jamie Doward and Simon Heffer observe a change in the legislation necessary after a pit bull mauled five-year-old Ellie Lawrenson. They both blame the owners to the dogs and see it as a big problem that irresponsible people has it bulls. Victoria Stilwell is opposite the to men against breed-specific legislation. She also blame the owners and says you would not leave your baby alone with a stranger so why a dog? 2. Characterize the nuance used by Simon Heffer in text 3. Illustrate your answer with examples from the text. Simon Heffer uses a readable language and do already catch the reader in the headline. Simon Heffer use a little Ethos and a little pathos when he writes about dangerous dogs and their owners.He explains his points in shortly sentence and he is comfortable to understand () 1057 of these repulsive animals are legally owned in this body politic After reading the tex t we can see that Simon Heffer is very indispensable when he writes about the owners of dogs not only the owner in the tier of Ellie Lawrenson, but every owner of a dog And it underlines the point that wherever one finds a dangerous dog, there is normally a dangerous human lurking not far away. It is like he also indicates that he find it more necessary to take control of all the dangerous human, like drug dealers (Kiel Simpson) and so on.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment